Introduction
The United Arab Emirates is home to two major international financial centres: Abu Dhabi Global Market and the Dubai International Financial Centre. Both offer independent legal systems based on common law, attract banks, asset managers, fintechs and advisers, and regulate firms to international standards. The similarities can be misleading when it comes to choosing where to set up, or if already in the one considering the other. Knowing where the two frameworks overlap and where they diverge is a useful starting point, and specialist ADGM Compliance Advisory can help translate the details into practical steps.
Two Regulators, Two Rulebooks
In ADGM, financial services are regulated by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA). In the DIFC, regulation falls to the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). Both regulatory bodies publish their own rulebooks, issue their own guidance and operate their own authorisation processes. While they have a shared objective of setting out global best practice and applying similar international standards, the language, structure and detail in the rules are not always the same. A policy that satisfies one regulator should not be copied verbatim by the other.
What the Two Centres Share
Both jurisdictions expect authorised firms to demonstrate sound governance and proper controls. Common themes include:
- Fit and proper individuals in senior roles
- A defined compliance function with real authority
- A designated person responsible for anti-money laundering matters
- Risk assessments that reflect the actual business
- Client classification and fair treatment rules
- Record-keeping and regular regulatory reporting
- Procedures for complaints, conflicts of interest and incident handling
Because of this overlap, a firm with strong foundations in one centre usually has a head start in the other.
Key Areas Where They Differ
The problem is that the fine print can often differ. That is, application forms, approval time-frames, reporting requirements, fee schedules and supervisory expectations can be different. The organisation of the rulebook modules can be different, and specific obligations such as particular ways of classifying certain activities or disclosing particular information, can be different. Even the titles of, and expectations for, key appointed people can contain subtle differences. Firms that operate in both centres need separate manuals, separate reporting calendars and separate monitoring plans.
Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Crime
Both centres take financial crime seriously and are aligned to international standards. Firms in each case need to apply risk-based customer due diligence, ongoing monitoring, sanctions screening and a clear process for escalating suspicious activity. Regular reports to senior management from the money laundering reporting officer are expected, but there are also differences in the documents required, reporting formats and supervisory focus areas, so firms should align their controls to the relevant rulebook.
Legal Environment
The legal frameworks are also not identical. ADGM applies English common law directly by virtue of its own founding legislation, while the DIFC has its own set of laws and regulations rooted in common law principles. While this difference may be less important to day-to-day operations for many firms, it can have implications for contracts, dispute resolution and corporate structuring. Legal advice should therefore be sought in tandem with advice on compliance.
Choosing Between the Two
There is no one right answer. You should take into account where your clients and counterparties are located, which regulator knows your business model best, what offices and talent you need, and how much time and money you have. Some companies opt for one region and stick to it, while others have operations in both places. It is a good idea to consult with a compliance expert so that you do not spend too much money on the wrong solution.
Managing Compliance Across Both Centres
If you operate in both locations, aim to develop a common core of governance principles and then tailor the documents and processes for each regulator. Maintain an up-to-date overview of which rules apply in which location, with an assignment of responsibility within each entity for addressing changes in the relevant rulebook. A centrally controlled but locally aware approach is likely to be effective./p>
How Ecovis JRB Can Help
Ecovis JRB supports regulated and growing firms with clear, practical compliance guidance. The team can assess your business model, explain the expectations of each centre and help you put a workable framework in place. Whether you are exploring a first licence, reviewing an existing set-up or planning to expand across jurisdictions, their ADGM Compliance Advisory and DIFC Compliance Advisory can be tailored to your needs. Firms preparing for supervisory reviews can also rely on ADGM Compliance Advisory that focuses on documentation, monitoring and staff awareness. Reach out through the Ecovis JRB website, and ask about ADGM Compliance Advisory for your next step.
Final Thoughts
ADGM and DIFC are both committed to international standards, but they are considered separate jurisdictions that set their own requirements and expectations. Know the key distinctions to prepare your compliance infrastructure and ensure that your organization is benefited from engaging in the United Arab Emirates. Consult experts to avoid inconsistencies and have peace of mind that your business processes are in order.
Talk to a partner about your specific situation.
Every business is different. If anything in this article applies to your situation, the quickest way forward is a 30-minute conversation with one of our partners — no sales call, just practical advice on what to do next.
Book a free consultation →